Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
Shop deviantART for the
holidays and save BIG!
Click here! :holly:
[x]

deviantART

:omfg:
 
©2009 ~foxestacado
:iconfoxestacado:

Artist's Comments

I was very interested in portraying Dumbledore's choice in leaving Harry with Petunia. In my opinion, his choice was a very calculated one, perhaps almost insidiously so, to leave Harry with his aunt Petunia. I refuse to believe, for a second, that he didn't know Aunt Petunia was a shrewd woman, who hated her sister Lily for becoming a witch and leaving her alone, and didn't imagine that she wouldn't take her vengeance upon Lily's orphan son. I think perhaps Dumbledore was carefully optimistic that Petunia would find some affection for Harry, and perhaps care for Harry as her own. But I don't think for a moment that Dumbledore was completely naive.

I think he was right in his calculation that leaving Harry with the Dursleys would enable Harry to grow up without much knowledge of the impact he had made in the wizarding world, and his status as a "savior." If a kid grew up knowing he was the wizarding world's savior, and raised by doting parents who treated him as such, he would likely not be the humble, grateful, awed child that arrived at Hogwarts. Dumbledore knew that Petunia and the Dursleys were magic-phobes, and so would be unlikely to try to integrate his wizarding culture into his upbringing. And thus Harry would have no knowledge of the circumstances surrounding his parents' death, and his nearly messanic status.

But I also think Dumbledore knew what this detachment from his own story would do to Harry. It would make Harry an orphan in more ways than merely losing his parents. He would lose his entire heritage, and the truth, and for not just a few years, but for most of his childhood. He would have no childhood, no notion or understanding of who he really is, and the loss of that truth is a fundamental part of his upbringing, and who he becomes.

By leaving Harry with the Dursleys, Dumbledore is ensuring that Harry would grow up with no knowledge of his wizarding roots, and thus enable a maximum experience of "magical wonderment" upon his entry into the magical world at age 11. It is possible to me that Dumbledore knew that life with the Dursleys would be tough on Harry, and so Harry's introduction into the magical world would have a profound impact on his psychology and sense of identity, and thus Harry will view the magical world as an integral, sustaining part of himself. This has critical implications to his later role as prophesied defeater of Voldemort.

------------------------------------------
LIMITED EDITION PRINTS ARE STILL AVAILABLE!

I am offering 11x14" and 16x20" prints of this painting. Please inquire (or email me at foxestacado@gmail.com), as I am not selling them through DA. Proceeds from print sales will help me auction off prints for charity!

Comments


love 1 1 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconnorthangel27:
Oh yes, I agree. Dumbledore himself often mentions the heights of his own intelligence. I highly doubt he even took a breath without first carefully considering all possible outcomes.

I have often thought this one of the reasons why Dumbledore was also so calculating in how he dealt with Severus Snape (doing nothing to cease the bullying in his youth, not punishing Black for the Whomping willow incident, letting Severus go after he overheard the prophecy, allowing the boy to sell his soul and lifelong service to Dumbledore in a moment of intense emotional distress, almost encouraging Severus to stay in a lifelong state of grieving for Lily Evans-Potter). The man was the ultimate puppet master ;-).

This is a wonderful portrait. I really love Dumbledore's eyes.

--
"In the end only love matters...
It is love that brought the universe into being
and it is love that will transform it...
Love is the Alchemist of the soul."
:iconfoxestacado:
Thank you! The eyes were incredibly difficult to achieve. I painted and repainted them at least 5 separate times, not counting revisions. Although I started this painting about 11 months ago, I didn't get this final version of the eyes until about one month ago.

I'm not sure about the interpretation of Dumbledore as an omniscient puppetmaster, though. I think as headmaster, he just didn't really see bullying as completely intolerable, much as our own system prior to the Columbine massacre. In fact, to this day, bullying is tolerated as almost a social fact at many "upperclass" schools throughout the world.

I think Dumbledore has always made mistakes though, and I think he recognizes that the way Severus turned out IS a result of mistakes on his part. I don't think he "engineered" Severus into who he is by playing puppeteer. I think he had the best intentions with Severus as a student, and perhaps was not as punishing as he should have been.

When Severus came to Dumbledore to save Lily, I think Severus saw him as a potential ally and spy, as a soldier at his disposal. If Dumbledore was a commander in chief, or general, then everyone who offers to fight he will see as a soldier. And Severus was his most trusted soldier...and I think he put Severus to work, not that Severus was protesting. Whether or not Dumbledore "manipulated" Severus to stay...I don't know. I think not, but I think there might have been a BIT of psychological manipulation there, or "encouragement," as you said. And I don't think it's out of line to say every general to some extent does this: warfare is very psychologically demanding, and if every general could not keep their soldiers...then that would be disastrous for any war effort.

--
Fox Estacado Arts
---------------------
[link]
[link]
[link]
:iconnorthangel27:
I agree with your assessment of soldiers and generals. Severus was Dumbledore's soldier in a way, and I think that a part of keeping soldiers loyal and invested despite all the horrors, and at times the pointlessness of war, is emotional and psychological manipulation ( I would actually go so far as to say brain washing in some cases, but then that would lead us down the path of my opinions on war and the military machine in general, and we just don't want to go there ;-)).

I think we will have to agree to disagree on Dumbledore's manipulating Severus into continuing to work for him all those years, because I very much think he did, not that the results of that were 100% negative, mind you. Severus did grow up and evolve morally somewhat during that time, and part of the reason why he did may have had to do with Dumbledore keeping him in his service (and out of Azkaban).

Anyhoo, that's just me going off on a weird HP tangent, at a time and in a place where it so wasn't called for. Lol. Sorry about that. The weirdest things get my wheels turning.

Great picture. People don't draw Dumbledore enough.

--
"In the end only love matters...
It is love that brought the universe into being
and it is love that will transform it...
Love is the Alchemist of the soul."
:iconposidendrawer:
featured here: [link]

--
When the world hates you remember it hated me first-Jesus
:iconposidendrawer:
feautred here [link]

--
When the world hates you remember it hated me first-Jesus
:iconfoxestacado:
Thank you so much! I am so honored!

--
Fox Estacado Arts
---------------------
[link]
[link]
[link]
:iconammonite:
Considering that Dumbledore didn't have the decency to tell Petunia that her sister died or even ask if she wanted the responsibility says that the man was going to have his way, no matter what the Dursleys wanted. I think by callously leaving a helpless infant on a doorstep in the middle of the night close to winter might have been his way of pulling the emotional strings of the Dursleys (or perhaps he may have been activing the "blood protections" just by leaving the child there). While I'm certain no one has sympathy for the Dursleys, it might be rational to suspect that at least Petunia lives in some mortal fear of some magical person coming to do something to her and her family. As muggles, they can't defend themselves and the supposed blood protections seems to only work in their home, and that isn't reliable either since a house elf did manage to find Harry and make some damage. Since Hagrid and McGonagall were present with Dumbledore the night he left Harry also shows that Dumbledore is good at surrounding himself with people who are not objective enough thinkers. McGonagall is a mature and supposedly intelligent woman, yet she agrees to do something that is just plain stupid shows that she may be more of a lacky than a reliable protector (should I mention that she is also accessory to child abandonment and endangerment?). Hagrid isn't intelligent to begin with and Dumbledore didn't mind sending him to terrorize the Dursleys when they were not being cooperative-saving the man from having to bully them himself and leaving Hagrid to get any reprimands if found out. It is rather ironic that of all the dangerous bullies and abusers Harry encountered, the greatest one is the man that for a long time, has his unwavering trust and devotion. The fact that he names his second son after this guy is pretty sad. On the otherhand, Dumbledore, like Severus, was proven to be more dynamic as a character and more morally complex when their histories are shown.
:iconammonite:
I like this picture by the way, Dumbledore is rarely made as a foreboding portrait. :painter: I think your skill in digital art is excellent and his face is very lifelike and detailed. I'm really impressed with the wrinkles in his face and hands
:iconkimiski:
Holy crap this is amazing...
the hair, the skin, the eyes... @__@
And I agree with everything you said.
I love the first chapter of book one of Harry Potter.

--
Like "The Slayers"? Join the TheSlayersClub on DevArt!!! [link]

Details

June 16
464 KB
464 KB
800×1000

Statistics

9
29 [who?]
453 (3 today)
4 (0 today)

Share

Link
Embed
Thumb

Site Map